-
1 knowledge information processing system
Information technology: KIPSУниверсальный русско-английский словарь > knowledge information processing system
-
2 knowledge information-processing system
Engineering: KIPSУниверсальный русско-английский словарь > knowledge information-processing system
-
3 KNowledge Orientated Office Model
Information technology: KNOOMУниверсальный русско-английский словарь > KNowledge Orientated Office Model
-
4 Knowledge Availability System Center
Information technology: KASCУниверсальный русско-английский словарь > Knowledge Availability System Center
-
5 Knowledge Availability System Centre
Information technology: KASCУниверсальный русско-английский словарь > Knowledge Availability System Centre
-
6 Knowledge Engineering Environment
Information technology: KEEУниверсальный русско-английский словарь > Knowledge Engineering Environment
-
7 Knowledge Management Systeme
Information technology: KMSУниверсальный русско-английский словарь > Knowledge Management Systeme
-
8 Knowledge Query Manipulation Language
Универсальный русско-английский словарь > Knowledge Query Manipulation Language
-
9 Knowledge Systems Laboratory of the National Research Council
Information technology: KSLNRC (organization, Canada, AI)Универсальный русско-английский словарь > Knowledge Systems Laboratory of the National Research Council
-
10 knowledge base machine translation
Information technology: KBMTУниверсальный русско-английский словарь > knowledge base machine translation
-
11 knowledge base management
Information technology: KBMУниверсальный русско-английский словарь > knowledge base management
-
12 Knowledge
It is indeed an opinion strangely prevailing amongst men, that houses, mountains, rivers, and, in a word, all sensible objects, have an existence, natural or real, distinct from their being perceived by the understanding. But, with how great an assurance and acquiescence soever this principle may be entertained in the world, yet whoever shall find in his heart to call it into question may, if I mistake not, perceive it to involve a manifest contradiction. For, what are the forementioned objects but things we perceive by sense? and what do we perceive besides our own ideas or sensations? and is it not plainly repugnant that any one of these, or any combination of them, should exist unperceived? (Berkeley, 1996, Pt. I, No. 4, p. 25)It seems to me that the only objects of the abstract sciences or of demonstration are quantity and number, and that all attempts to extend this more perfect species of knowledge beyond these bounds are mere sophistry and illusion. As the component parts of quantity and number are entirely similar, their relations become intricate and involved; and nothing can be more curious, as well as useful, than to trace, by a variety of mediums, their equality or inequality, through their different appearances.But as all other ideas are clearly distinct and different from each other, we can never advance farther, by our utmost scrutiny, than to observe this diversity, and, by an obvious reflection, pronounce one thing not to be another. Or if there be any difficulty in these decisions, it proceeds entirely from the undeterminate meaning of words, which is corrected by juster definitions. That the square of the hypotenuse is equal to the squares of the other two sides cannot be known, let the terms be ever so exactly defined, without a train of reasoning and enquiry. But to convince us of this proposition, that where there is no property, there can be no injustice, it is only necessary to define the terms, and explain injustice to be a violation of property. This proposition is, indeed, nothing but a more imperfect definition. It is the same case with all those pretended syllogistical reasonings, which may be found in every other branch of learning, except the sciences of quantity and number; and these may safely, I think, be pronounced the only proper objects of knowledge and demonstration. (Hume, 1975, Sec. 12, Pt. 3, pp. 163-165)Our knowledge springs from two fundamental sources of the mind; the first is the capacity of receiving representations (the ability to receive impressions), the second is the power to know an object through these representations (spontaneity in the production of concepts).Through the first, an object is given to us; through the second, the object is thought in relation to that representation.... Intuition and concepts constitute, therefore, the elements of all our knowledge, so that neither concepts without intuition in some way corresponding to them, nor intuition without concepts, can yield knowledge. Both may be either pure or empirical.... Pure intuitions or pure concepts are possible only a priori; empirical intuitions and empirical concepts only a posteriori. If the receptivity of our mind, its power of receiving representations in so far as it is in any way affected, is to be called "sensibility," then the mind's power of producing representations from itself, the spontaneity of knowledge, should be called "understanding." Our nature is so constituted that our intuitions can never be other than sensible; that is, it contains only the mode in which we are affected by objects. The faculty, on the other hand, which enables us to think the object of sensible intuition is the understanding.... Without sensibility, no object would be given to us; without understanding, no object would be thought. Thoughts without content are empty; intuitions without concepts are blind. It is therefore just as necessary to make our concepts sensible, that is, to add the object to them in intuition, as to make our intuitions intelligible, that is to bring them under concepts. These two powers or capacities cannot exchange their functions. The understanding can intuit nothing, the senses can think nothing. Only through their union can knowledge arise. (Kant, 1933, Sec. 1, Pt. 2, B74-75 [p. 92])Metaphysics, as a natural disposition of Reason is real, but it is also, in itself, dialectical and deceptive.... Hence to attempt to draw our principles from it, and in their employment to follow this natural but none the less fallacious illusion can never produce science, but only an empty dialectical art, in which one school may indeed outdo the other, but none can ever attain a justifiable and lasting success. In order that, as a science, it may lay claim not merely to deceptive persuasion, but to insight and conviction, a Critique of Reason must exhibit in a complete system the whole stock of conceptions a priori, arranged according to their different sources-the Sensibility, the understanding, and the Reason; it must present a complete table of these conceptions, together with their analysis and all that can be deduced from them, but more especially the possibility of synthetic knowledge a priori by means of their deduction, the principles of its use, and finally, its boundaries....This much is certain: he who has once tried criticism will be sickened for ever of all the dogmatic trash he was compelled to content himself with before, because his Reason, requiring something, could find nothing better for its occupation. Criticism stands to the ordinary school metaphysics exactly in the same relation as chemistry to alchemy, or as astron omy to fortune-telling astrology. I guarantee that no one who has comprehended and thought out the conclusions of criticism, even in these Prolegomena, will ever return to the old sophistical pseudo-science. He will rather look forward with a kind of pleasure to a metaphysics, certainly now within his power, which requires no more preparatory discoveries, and which alone can procure for reason permanent satisfaction. (Kant, 1891, pp. 115-116)Knowledge is only real and can only be set forth fully in the form of science, in the form of system. Further, a so-called fundamental proposition or first principle of philosophy, even if it is true, it is yet none the less false, just because and in so far as it is merely a fundamental proposition, merely a first principle. It is for that reason easily refuted. The refutation consists in bringing out its defective character; and it is defective because it is merely the universal, merely a principle, the beginning. If the refutation is complete and thorough, it is derived and developed from the nature of the principle itself, and not accomplished by bringing in from elsewhere other counter-assurances and chance fancies. It would be strictly the development of the principle, and thus the completion of its deficiency, were it not that it misunderstands its own purport by taking account solely of the negative aspect of what it seeks to do, and is not conscious of the positive character of its process and result. The really positive working out of the beginning is at the same time just as much the very reverse: it is a negative attitude towards the principle we start from. Negative, that is to say, in its one-sided form, which consists in being primarily immediate, a mere purpose. It may therefore be regarded as a refutation of what constitutes the basis of the system; but more correctly it should be looked at as a demonstration that the basis or principle of the system is in point of fact merely its beginning. (Hegel, 1910, pp. 21-22)Knowledge, action, and evaluation are essentially connected. The primary and pervasive significance of knowledge lies in its guidance of action: knowing is for the sake of doing. And action, obviously, is rooted in evaluation. For a being which did not assign comparative values, deliberate action would be pointless; and for one which did not know, it would be impossible. Conversely, only an active being could have knowledge, and only such a being could assign values to anything beyond his own feelings. A creature which did not enter into the process of reality to alter in some part the future content of it, could apprehend a world only in the sense of intuitive or esthetic contemplation; and such contemplation would not possess the significance of knowledge but only that of enjoying and suffering. (Lewis, 1946, p. 1)"Evolutionary epistemology" is a branch of scholarship that applies the evolutionary perspective to an understanding of how knowledge develops. Knowledge always involves getting information. The most primitive way of acquiring it is through the sense of touch: amoebas and other simple organisms know what happens around them only if they can feel it with their "skins." The knowledge such an organism can have is strictly about what is in its immediate vicinity. After a huge jump in evolution, organisms learned to find out what was going on at a distance from them, without having to actually feel the environment. This jump involved the development of sense organs for processing information that was farther away. For a long time, the most important sources of knowledge were the nose, the eyes, and the ears. The next big advance occurred when organisms developed memory. Now information no longer needed to be present at all, and the animal could recall events and outcomes that happened in the past. Each one of these steps in the evolution of knowledge added important survival advantages to the species that was equipped to use it.Then, with the appearance in evolution of humans, an entirely new way of acquiring information developed. Up to this point, the processing of information was entirely intrasomatic.... But when speech appeared (and even more powerfully with the invention of writing), information processing became extrasomatic. After that point knowledge did not have to be stored in the genes, or in the memory traces of the brain; it could be passed on from one person to another through words, or it could be written down and stored on a permanent substance like stone, paper, or silicon chips-in any case, outside the fragile and impermanent nervous system. (Csikszentmihalyi, 1993, pp. 56-57)Historical dictionary of quotations in cognitive science > Knowledge
-
13 knowledge
Gen Mgtinformation acquired by the interpretation of experience. Knowledge is built up from interaction with the world and organized and stored in each individual’s mind. It is also stored on an organizational level within the minds of employees and in paper and electronic records. Two forms of knowledge can be distinguished: tacit knowledge or implicit knowledge, which is held in a person’s mind and is instinctively known without being formulated into words; and explicit knowledge, which has been communicated to others and is contained in written documents and procedures. Organizations are increasingly recognizing the value of knowledge, and many employees are now recognized as knowledge workers. A major writer in this area is Ikujiro Nonaka, coauthor of The Knowledge-Creating Company (1995), who asserted that knowledge is the greatest core capability (see core competence) that an organization can have. -
14 knowledge worker
Gen Mgtan employee who deals in information, ideas, and expertise. Knowledge workers are products of the so-called information age, in which the emphasis is on creativity and innovation rather than on maintaining the status quo. According to Peter Drucker, in the new economy every employee is becoming a knowledge worker. -
15 Information
f; -, -en* * *die Informationinformation; piece of information; info* * *In|for|ma|ti|on [ɪnfɔrma'tsioːn]f1) information no pl (über +acc about, on)eine Informatión — (a piece of) information
Informatiónen weitergeben — to pass on information
zu Ihrer Informatión — for your information
2) (= Stelle) information desk* * *(facts told or knowledge gained or given: Can you give me any information about this writer?; the latest information on the progress of the war; He is full of interesting bits of information.) information* * *In·for·ma·ti·on<-, -en>[ɪnfɔrmaˈtsi̯o:n]fdie fehlenden \Informationen nachtragen ADMIN to supply the missing data\Informationen liefern/sammeln to give/collect [or gather] informationanaloge/digitale \Information INFORM analog/digital information2. (das Informieren) informingzu Ihrer \Information for your information3. (Informationsstand) information deskmelden Sie sich bitte bei der \Information please report to the information desk* * *die; Information, Informationen1) information no pl., no indef. art. (über + Akk. about, on)eine Information — [a piece of] information
nähere Informationen erhalten Sie... — you can obtain more information...
* * *1. auch pl information (über +akk on, about);zu Ihrer Information for your information* * *die; Information, Informationen1) information no pl., no indef. art. (über + Akk. about, on)eine Information — [a piece of] information
nähere Informationen erhalten Sie... — you can obtain more information...
* * *f.information n. -
16 knowledge
[ˈnɔlɪdʒ] noun1) the fact of knowing:مَعْرِفَهShe was greatly encouraged by the knowledge that she had won first prize in the competition.
2) information or what is known:مَعْلوماتHe had a vast amount of knowledge about boats.
3) the whole of what can be learned or found out:عِلْمScience is a branch of knowledge about which I am rather ignorant.
-
17 Information Processing
The term "information processing" originated in the late fifties in the computer field as a general descriptive term that seemed somewhat less contingent and parochial than "computer science," which also came into use during the same period. Thus, it was the name of choice for two of the encompassing professional organizations formed at the time: the In ternational Federation of Information Processing Societies and the American Federation of Information Processing Societies. Although the transfer of the phrase from activities of computers to parallel activities of human beings undoubtedly occurred independently in a number of heads, the term was originally identified pretty closely with computer simulation of cognitive processes... ; that is, with the kind of effort from which arose the theory in this book. (Newell & Simon, 1972, p. 888)It was because the activities of the computer itself seemed in some ways akin to cognitive processes. Computers accept information, manipulate symbols, store items in "memory" and retrieve them again, classify inputs, recognize patterns and so on.... Indeed the assumptions that underlie most contemporary work on information processing are surprisingly like those of nineteenth century introspective psychology, though without introspection itself. (Neisser, 1976, pp. 5, 7)The processor was assumed to be rational, and attention was directed to the logical nature of problem solving strategies. The "mature western mind" was presumed to be one that, in abstracting knowledge from the idosyncracies of particular everyday experience, employed Aristotelian laws of logic. When applied to categories, this meant that to know a category was to have an abstracted clear-cut, necessary, and sufficient criteria for category membership. If other thought processes, such as imagery, ostensive definition, reasoning by analogy to particular instances, or the use of metaphors were considered at all, they were usually relegated to lesser beings such as women, children, primitive people, or even to nonhumans. (Rosch & Lloyd, 1978, p. 2)Historical dictionary of quotations in cognitive science > Information Processing
-
18 knowledge management
Gen Mgt [m1]1. the process of acquiring, storing, distributing, and using information within a company. The information is generally held on a powerful database and distributed via a communications network.2. the coordination and exploitation of an organization’s knowledge resources, in order to create benefit and competitive advantage -
19 information
nounfacts told or knowledge gained or given:Can you give me any information about this writer?
مَعلوماتHe is full of interesting bits of information.
-
20 Information Processes
[Three basic kinds of elementary information processes are] metacomponents, which are high order control processes that are used in executive planning and decision making in problem solving; performance components, which are lower order processes used in executing a problem-solving strategy; and knowledge-acquisition components, which are lower order processes used in acquiring, retaining and transferring new information. (Sternberg & Davidson, 1985, p. 51)Historical dictionary of quotations in cognitive science > Information Processes
См. также в других словарях:
Knowledge Management — (KM) comprises a range of practices used by organisations to identify, create, represent, distribute and enable adoption of what it knows, and how it knows it. It has been an established discipline since 1995 [Stankosky, 2005] with a body of… … Wikipedia
information economy — UK US noun [C] ► ECONOMICS an economy in which knowledge, information, and services are more valuable than manufacturing: »The technological revolution associated with the computer and the information economy has accelerated the shift of… … Financial and business terms
Information society — For other uses, see Information society (disambiguation). The aim of the information society is to gain competitive advantage internationally through using IT in a creative and productive way. An information society is a society in which the… … Wikipedia
Knowledge Management — Gestion des connaissances La gestion des connaissances (en anglais Knowledge Management) est l ensemble des initiatives, des méthodes et des techniques permettant de percevoir, d identifier, d analyser, d organiser, de mémoriser, et de partager… … Wikipédia en Français
Knowledge management — Gestion des connaissances La gestion des connaissances (en anglais Knowledge Management) est l ensemble des initiatives, des méthodes et des techniques permettant de percevoir, d identifier, d analyser, d organiser, de mémoriser, et de partager… … Wikipédia en Français
Information science — Not to be confused with Information theory. Contents 1 Introduction 2 A multitude of information sciences? 3 Definitions of information science 4 History … Wikipedia
Knowledge worker — Knowledge workers in today s workforce are individuals who are valued for their ability to act and communicate with knowledge within a specific subject area. They will often advance the overall understanding of that subject through focused… … Wikipedia
Knowledge management — (KM) comprises a range of strategies and practices used in an organization to identify, create, represent, distribute, and enable adoption of insights and experiences. Such insights and experiences comprise knowledge, either embodied in… … Wikipedia
Knowledge retrieval — is a field of study which seeks to return information in a structured form, consistent with human cognitive processes as opposed to simple lists of data items. It draws on a range of fields including Epistemology (Theory of knowledge), Cognitive… … Wikipedia
Knowledge market — is a mechanism for distributing knowledge resources. There are two views on knowledge and how knowledge markets can function. One view uses a legal construct of intellectual property to make knowledge a typical scarce resource, so the traditional … Wikipedia
Knowledge representation — is an area in artificial intelligence that is concerned with how to formally think , that is, how to use a symbol system to represent a domain of discourse that which can be talked about, along with functions that may or may not be within the… … Wikipedia
